Photos from the Dark

For the 1 Day 1 World Project, we are at the hour of 11 pm – 12 am.

I had seen a photography idea of going out at night and shooting close-ups of plants with the flash, so I decided to try that.  (It’s not something that really represents my normal 11 pm hour, but I am using this project to do things a little out of the ordinary for me.)

caterpillar on pokeweed

The pictures showed a lot of detail, but I didn’t think they were very interesting.  But when editing them, I noticed this caterpillar chomping away at my pokeweed plant.  I use pokeberries for natural dye – but the caterpillar is welcome to the leaves!

caterpillar and pokeweed

 

Bayeux Tapestry – Books, Part Two

Reading about the Bayeux Tapestry made me want to know more background information on the Normans – where did they come from?  Why did they want to expand into England?  I mean, the north of France is a pretty nice place, why weren’t they just content there?  So here’s what I read:

1)  Norman Conquest:The Battle of Hastings and the Fall of Anglo-Saxon England by Marc Morris.  This is my absolute favorite out of everything I read. It is structured almost like a novel, with the chapters alternating between England and Normandy, and chapter-ending cliffhangers, but what I love best is its informal tone and pithy remarks.

If we had to sum this new society up in a single word, we might describe it as feudal – but only if we were prepared for an outbreak of fainting fits among medieval historians.  The problem with the word feudal, they will tell you, is that it is not actually a medieval word at all, but a coinage of sixteenth-century lawyers…(p. 48)

Morris quotes from different source materials, explaining who wrote them, when, and why.  Some are copies of the same book, the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, kept in different monasteries and therefore, annotated by people of differing loyalties.  He builds these varying viewpoints into a rich, lively account of how the Normans conquered England and what happened afterward.  I particularly like how he personifies the source books:

The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, having dealt with the murder of Alfred, thereafter maintains a studious silence on political matters for the rest of Harold’s reign, commenting only on ecclesiastical affairs and the state of the weather.  (p. 38)

‘We do not know’, says the D version of the Chronicle, ‘who first suggested this mischief’, not for the first time infuriating us by hinting that there was some wider conspiracy at work, but failing to divulge anything in the way of details.  (p. 120)

(I keep picturing the Chronicle books as looking like the little Geico insurance box character in the commercials, raising their eyebrows and whistling while they keep their politically-incorrect opinions to themselves.)

Morris’ book explains the importance of the Tapestry feasting scenes that I found puzzling – the Normans were raiding the countryside deliberately.  William didn’t want to have to march his men to London, and risk them being spread out to be picked off.  He wanted to sit tight and make Harold come to him. In Hastings, the people were Harold’s own tenants – he had a special duty to protect them, so he rushed off to do so, possibly without a full fighting force.

Some of us have problems keeping history straight, in part because the same names and places recur so often – Morris does such an excellent job of distinguishing between people and making them memorable, that I feel that I actually know all the people (not that I would want to – most of these people were horrible to each other!).

2) The Normans: From Raiders to Kings, by Lars Brownworth.  I’m not sure this book even mentions the Bayeux Tapestry, but it is a very quick and interesting account of the background of the Normans.  It also goes beyond the Battle of Hastings to tell about other Norman families who supported the Byzantine emperors, and ruled Sicily.

3)  The Handfasted Wife, by Carol McGrath.  There are only three women in the main body of the Tapestry – Edith, the mysterious Ælgyva, and an anonymous woman fleeing a burning house.  This novel combines that anonymous woman with the historical character of Harold’s first wife, and mother of his six children. When Harold becomes king, he puts her aside while he makes a better match politically, and yet, after the Battle of Hastings, she is the one called to identify his body.

I wanted to like this book, but I just couldn’t lose myself in it.  I felt like it skipped over the big events (Harold’s wife and mother are in a tent close to the battlefield the night before…and then it’s the next day and the battle is just over), while making sure to regularly include authentic details of medieval life, as if there was a checklist.  “On Wednesday, we ate pottage and drank ale, oversaw the mead brewing, went to Vespers services, and spoke to the woodcutter.”  (That is my own totally made-up sentence, but it sums up my impressions.)

However, this book had some interesting plot twists  – for example, after the Conquest, Harold’s mother, Gytha, retreats to her city of Exeter and defies king William, withholding the tax money.  I was absolutely sure that the author had taken liberties with history here, in the interest of creating a strong female character – but no!  All of that is absolutely true!  And I didn’t learn that from the non-fiction books on the Normans, so it was worth my time to read this book too.

4) Bonus Video – Battlefield Detectives: Who Got Lucky at Hastings?  You’d think, that with the enormous impact the Conquest had on history (for example, 20 years afterward, only 8% of the land in England was still in the hands of its original owners – about a fifth of the English population had died; 200,000 Normans and French had moved in, the English language was no longer used in official documents, and castles popped up everywhere), that there would be a plethora of videos on the subject.  In all of Amazon, and Netflix, I could only find one.

It’s from 2003, and I think their “experts” are a little questionable – a modern day horse-trainer, a woman who is stitching her own replica of the Tapestry, and a professor who thinks that Harold is shown with an arrow in his eye to reflect God’s punishment for perjury (because losing your kingdom and getting hacked to death are not punishment enough?)  There is also a corporate trainer with a PowerPoint comparing Harold and William to CEOs.

However, they do a very nice job of explaining what the terrain was like in 1066, and why it took place where it did, so it was worth the 49 minutes of my life to learn that.

So now I know everything I need to know about the Bayeux Tapestry and the Battle of Hastings.  Except I just found a Battlefield Britain episode on IMDb, and I also found another novel by Georgette Heyer…

 

 

 

 

 

Bayeux Tapestry – Books, Part One

The Bayeux Tapestry seems so modern in its objectivity.  It presents what happened, but you can never tell what side it’s on.  No individual stands out as looking more handsome and heroic than any other, both armies are shown fighting bravely and also suffering casualties, and both sides are shown looting and rampaging.

So through the centuries, people have wanted to know who made it, and where.  It used to be attributed to William’s wife Mathilda.  Now the general consensus is that it was commissioned by Odo, William’s half-brother, who was bishop of Bayeux.   I haven’t brought him up before, because I was trying to give just the bare outline of the battle, but he is in the Tapestry four times – once in the thick of the battle, on horseback, rallying the Normans.

Bishop Odo with his club. (I love the guy in the bottom border with the two spears lodged in his shield!)

Bishop Odo

It might seem like a bishop is the perfect candidate for commissioning the Tapestry, but he wasn’t your average bishop.  After the Conquest, he became earl of Kent, and was periodically left in charge of all England whenever William had business back in Normandy.  The chronicler Orderic “tells us that Odo ‘had greater authority than all the earls and other magnates in the kingdom.'” (Morris, Norman Conquest, more about this book tomorrow)

Odo was known to solve land disputes by taking the land in question himself, even church property.  In 1072, the archbishop of Canterbury wrote about Odo’s land-grabs in a complaint to the king.  The king agreed to investigate – so many properties were affected, that it took three days for the hearings.  At a different abbey, Odo packed a court with witnesses so he could pry 28 properties away from it. And that is just a small sample of his handiwork.

I have a hard time believing that this man would bother to commission a linen and wool embroidery.   If he ordered any hangings at all, I think he would have to have the best –  silk, gold thread,pearls, and jewels – and, I think, he would make sure he was represented as the biggest, boldest figure of all.

So who else could have commissioned it?

Carola Hicks has put forward a very interesting possibility – someone who was known to be educated and artistic, someone who had run a royal embroidery workshop – Edith, Edward’s queen and Harold’s sister.

Perhaps following the example of her mother-in-law, queen Emma, Edith had commissioned a similar, public-relations type of book. It is now called The Life of King Edward, and it portrays Edward as saintly and celibate – it’s as if Edith is pointing out, “If he had done his duty and sired an heir, this Conquest business would never have happened!  It is not my fault!”

Besides Harold, Edith had four other brothers – Swein, who abducted an abbess, murdered his cousin, and died on the way home from Jerusalem; Tostig, who, not content with being the mere earl of Northumbria, raised two separate rebellions, and was killed by Harold just weeks before William invaded; and then two more who died with Harold at Hastings. Given that tumultuous history, you might see why Edith wasted no time in offering fealty to William, and paying tribute.  Her strategy worked – unlike most of the English, Edith was allowed to keep most of her estates, and when she died, William had her buried with honor.

Commissioning the Tapestry could have been another way for Edith to profess her loyalty to William, as well as include flattering references to the equally powerful Odo.  The creation of a narrative intended for the eyes of the new order in England, both Norman and English, a court-based audience that included the kin of warriors who had fought on both sides of Hastings, is the only way to account for many of the ambiguities that divide commentators today.  Did the Tapestry favor William or Harold?  Was it made so that Normans could impress the subjugated foe?  Or so that the English could flatter, yet secretly insult, the victors?  These conflicting aims could be convincingly reconciled by someone with a foot in both camps, an English person who accepted the Norman occupation but who was still concerned to provide a dignified defense of Harold’s conduct. ( I don’t have page numbers, but this is e-reader Location 708 of 8023.)

Edith might also choose the events to justify Harold’s coronation – “Yes, King William, it’s true that he swore allegiance to you, but then, it was Edward’s dying wish that he take the throne!  I was there!  I know!  What else could he do?”

If Edith was the patron, I also think that could explain the choice of materials.  When king Edward was alive, Edith is recorded as making clothing for him, using gold thread and precious stones.  If any of those expensive supplies were left, she might want to avoid bringing William’s attention to them.  She might want to present herself as a humble subject, offering her time and effort to her new liege lord, without piquing his interest as to just how many rich materials she had tucked away.

There are many more mysteries and tales about the Bayeux Tapestry – Who is Ælfgyva and why is that cleric touching her face?  Why are some of the scenes out of order? Did Harold really die from an arrow to the eye? – but those have been written about extensively.

As a matter of fact, Carola Hicks says that there were over 500 books and articles written about the Tapestry, as of 1999, so I may not have found the Ultimate Source.  But here is a little about the books I read, if you want to learn more.

1)  The Bayeux Tapestry: The Life Story of a Masterpiece, by Carola Hicks.  It is extremely well-researched and balanced.  While Hicks proposes Edith as its patron, she also gives the evidence for other possible patrons.

I was most interested in the first three chapters – The Plot, The Patron, The Project.  The rest of the book covers the history of the Tapestry over the years, and that is fascinating too.  Dickens and Tennyson saw it, Napoleon and Himmler took it.  She also has chapters on the Tapestry’s use in movies, political cartoons, and ads.

2)  A Needle in the Right Hand of God, by R. Howard Bloch.  This book also has a wealth of information about the production of the Tapestry, down to the twists per meter in the warp and weft, and descriptions of the embroidery stitches.

Most of the book is explaining the multicultural sources for the images, from Scandinavian images of boats to Byzantine silks of lions and griffins.  I found these chapters very “listy”.  Bloch would say something like,”Aesop’s fable of the Crane and the Fox is also seen in The Baysdowne Psalter of 1306, Pope Pius XIII’s cope for Ascension Day services, and Duke Ormondier’s sword hilt,”  (I made all those up, by the way), but there wouldn’t be pictures of any of them, or even information as to where you might find those items to see for yourself.  I ended up skimming a lot.

Also, Bloch’s theory is that the Tapestry was made especially to unify the disparate elements of English society:

…the Tapestry interweaves elements associated with Anglo-Saxon, Scandinavian, and Norman culture.  And in this way, the surface of the textile expresses a desire for reconciliation among the principals to a bitter and extended struggle.  (e-reader Location 2995 of 3276.)

The Bayeux Tapestry is inclusive…It is the artistic embodiment of a pluralism within the sphere of social relations, giving expression to competing claims in England, while working toward a synthesis by which they might converge at some moment in the future. (e-reader Location 3008 of 3276)

To me this seems to be attributing too much good will to the makers of the Tapestry – I can see Edith justifying her family to the current rulers of England, or even Odo commemorating his career, but I just don’t see someone creating the design with an eye to making everyone feel included in the new regime.  I think the victors usually commend themselves for the conquest, without worrying about the feelings of the conquered.

Alright, well this ran longer than I thought – but, Hey,people!  I have read something like 1400 pages on this topic! – so I will finish reviewing resources tomorrow.

Bayeux Tapestry – the Basics

So when we left off yesterday, king Edward of England had finally succeeded in ridding his kingdom of his unwanted adviser, Godwine, and Godwine’s whole family.

For a short time it looks like Edward might get to run England as he pleases. He even gets William of Normandy to cross the channel for a visit, and although we don’t know for sure, it seems that they make a deal – Edward will pass the kingdom down to William (who is his second cousin after all, whereas Harold is just his brother-in-law), in return for his support and protection.

But then Edward makes a fatal mistake.  In 1051, in order to cut taxes, he disbands his mercenary fleet. A year later, Godwine and family take advantage of the now weakly protected coast to return with a strong force.  Many Englishmen join his cause, possibly because they oppose the idea of a Norman succession. Edward is forced to pardon Godwine, and restore everything he had taken from the family.  Even Edith returns from the nunnery.

Godwine dies in 1053, but that does not stop his family from expanding its influence – by 1060 Harold and his brothers control all of England except Mercia (a large section in the middle of England).  Two of them attack Wales and win.   Edward seems to give up on politics, and retreat more and more into religion and hunting (which later earns him the nickname The Confessor).

And that’s where we are when the Bayeux Tapestry opens.  Edward is on the throne, looking kindly at Harold.  The first half of the Tapestry shows Harold’s adventures – he sets sail (perhaps to arrange for the return of two men being held hostage in Normandy), ends up across the Channel in the hands of Guy of Ponthieu, is rescued by William of Normandy, and helps William win a decisive battle.  I have not been a fan of Harold, but I would think his help in the battle would make William grateful, but instead he has to become William’s vassal.  We see a ceremony in which William gives him arms, and then Harold is shown —

—well, you tell me.  What do you see here?

William seated on the left, Harold standing on the right – Vassal?  or just Vacillating?

Scene 23

I see a very unhappy man who either cannot reach both boxes at the same time, or can’t choose which one to pick.  He looks conflicted about the whole situation.

But it turns out to be one of the most important scenes in the Tapestry.  From the Norman point of view, he is swearing loyalty on holy relics!!!  You can not take that back!

From the Anglo-Saxon point of view, he is swearing under duress!!!  Everybody knows that William won’t let him return to England until he swears loyalty, so that doesn’t count! (In one written account, the Anglo-Saxons said that William hid the relics under a table, so that Harold did not even know they were there when he swore allegiance.)

Harold returns to England (with only one of the hostages) and talks to king Edward. He looks to be in trouble, maybe explaining why he was only half successful.

Harold is second from left – he does not look like a man who’s been pushing the king around and running England.

Scene 25

Shortly thereafter Edward dies, surrounded by only four people – Harold, Edith (who, you remember, is Harold’s sister), a servant, and a cleric.  Two men hand Harold the crown, one of them pointing backward to the dead king Edward, as if to say, “That’s what he wanted!”

The center scene of the Tapestry shows Harold enthroned. Viewers would think – Is this what was supposed to happen?  What about the oaths he made to William?

We immediately have some portents of doom, as people point up to a comet (which we know as Halley’s comet), and a ghost fleet shows up in the lower border.

A messenger sails over to William, William builds a fleet, and the Normans launch their invasion, with ships full of horses (new technology at the time).  As they land in England, the Normans build fortifications and ravage the countryside for food, and then pause for a feast.

Warriors use their shields as portable tables; nobles have a banquet table set up for them.

Scene 43

I find this puzzling.  Two huge events have been left out of the Tapestry –  William had made an earlier attempt to sail to England, but his ships ran aground in Brittany, where the Normans jumped on the opportunity to attack the locals; while back in England, there had been a whole different invasion just a few weeks before, with Harold defeating his own brother Tostig and the king of Norway.

So, those events are skipped, but the Tapestry artists take the time and effort to show people eating?  (My husband says it’s obvious – this is the commercial break.  “This battle is brought to you by Channel Fisheries – for the freshest chowder, choose Channel!”)

After the feast, we have numerous scenes of the battle.

What skill at capturing the action!

Scene 53

The Normans fight on horseback, while the Anglo-Saxons fight on the ground, behind their wall of shields.  Both sides are shown fighting bravely, and in the bottom border we see dead and dismembered bodies, and people stripping the dead of their mail shirts. Harold is killed, and the Tapestry ends with a raveled edge  – the missing part is probably about 1.5 meters long, and would show William sitting on the throne.

Okay, so that’s the basic story line – if you’re just here for the history lesson, you can go now.  Come back tomorrow for the conspiracy theories.

But if you are a crafty sort, and you’re interested in the actual construction of the Tapestry, here are the basics.

It is 70 meters long and 50 cm high, on a base cloth of linen.

There are nine sections, but they are sewn together so well, that the seams are very hard to notice.  (It was thought there were eight sections – the ninth one was noticed in 1998, but that was not publicized until 2004, so some resources say eight.)

Two of the sections are 14 meters long, which leads historians to believe that the linen was woven on a horizontal treadle loom, which would have been new technology in Europe at the time.  Traditional European looms were vertical looms, a lot like Navajo looms in our day.  There are 18-19 warps per centimeter, or about 45 warps per inch.  That is fine weaving, especially when you consider that all of that linen would have been spun by hand, with drop spindles.

Here’s one thing that astounds me – the cloth was initially woven at 100 cm wide, and then cut in half the long way!  If you know anything about cloth, you know that when it is cut, it unravels.  We weavers love a good strong selvege, and dread a cut in our cloth.  It would be faster for me to weave a skinny piece of cloth the full length I needed, than to weave a wider piece of cloth, cut it in half, and hem the resulting cut sides.

The other sections are various lengths.  Historians think they may have been cut up to allow more stitching teams to work on them simultaneously.  (Only once in my reading have I come across the notion that maybe a mistake was made and the piece cut out, which, if I had been working on it, would surely have happened to me.)

In reading about all the changing political factions of the time, I have wondered whether some sections were cut out because they portrayed events that it was suddenly not politically expedient to show!

The embroidery yarn was all wool (with the exception of one or two small areas of linen).  Three dyes were used – weld for yellow, woad for blue, and madder for red.  These were used in different mixtures, to come up with a total of ten shades.

If you would like to know more about how the designer and stitchers worked, Carola Hicks has a wonderful, detailed explanation of all the materials and techniques that were used, in The Bayeux Tapestry: The Life Story of a Masterpiece.   R. Howard Bloch has chapters about the source material for the illustrations in his book A Needle in the Right Hand of God: The Norman Conquest and the Making and Meaning of the Bayeux Tapestry.

Next up – some interesting theories about the Tapestry – who made it and why – and some good resources for learning more.

 

 

Bayeux Tapestry – the Backstory

All I wanted was to stay inside for an afternoon, out of the heat, and learn a little more about sail history.  “I bet historians have written about the ships on the Bayeux Tapestry,” I thought, “How long could it take to find out about that?”

Six weeks, five books, and one video later, I am slowly emerging from the world of the 11th century, full of information (but none of it on ships).

Norman ships in the Bayeux Tapestry

from Wikimedia Commons

The Bayeux Tapestry* depicts the Battle of Hastings in 1066, when William of Normandy invaded England and defeated its Anglo-Saxon king, Harold.  It is 70 meters long and 50 cm tall, and probably took a year or so to make, so I think it deserves more than one post.  I’m planning to do three – this one on the background story, then a shorter one on how it was made, and then one that sums up the resources I used.

I think it’s easier to understand who is doing what in the Tapestry, if you know what was going on with their families a generation or so before .  For me it boils down to three people who were at the heart of things. (Because this is just a blog post, and not an HBO series, I am going to leave out many many spouses, siblings, rebellions, exiles, and deaths.  Also, I am not a historian, and even real historians aren’t sure of all the details, so please view this as just a rough idea of what went on.)

Richard II, duke of Normandy, is the first person. He doesn’t come into the story much, but he’s a relation of half of the people that do.

The second is his sister Emma, who gets married twice, both times to men who have children from previous wives.  Emma does not fit the stereotype of demure, retiring medieval women.  She is ambitious and  manipulative, and she is involved in struggles between her sons, between her sons and their half-brothers, and between her sons and her advisers.

We know a lot about Emma, because she left us a book all about herself.  Written about 1041, by a hired writer, it is titled In Praise of Queen Emma (Encomium Emmae Reginae).  It may be the first book written strictly to put a positive public relations spin on the life of a living person.

As a piece of special pleading and blatant flattery, Emma’s Encomium had no precedent.  It was not the biography of a long-dead saint, but dealt with recent political events and the deeds of herself and her contemporaries.

-Carola Hicks, The Bayeux Tapestry: The Life Story of a Masterpiece

Emma’s first marriage, in 1002, is to Æthelred, the king of England.  They have three children, Edward, Alfred, Godgifu.

Æthelred does not have a peaceful rule.  In 1013 and 1015, the Vikings invade England and set up a king.  The first time Æthelred takes his family to safety in Normandy, returns when circumstances allow, and rules again.  The second time, the children again flee to safety with their uncle, duke Richard II, but Æthelred has died.  Emma remains in England, and marries the new king, Cnut of Denmark**, and has a son with him, Harthacnut.

The third person, Godwine, is one of Cnut’s advisers.  We know that he is an  Englishman, but nothing else about his origins.  By 1018 he is made an earl, is married to Cnut’s sister-in-law, Gytha, and before too long is in charge of all of southern England.  We will skip over all their children except Harold and Edith.

Things run along as usual for the next 20 years – lots of territorial disputes, plots, feuds, death and destruction.  Over in Normandy, duke Richard II dies.  Edward and Alfred are living peacefully with their cousin Robert, who rules Normandy for about seven years.  He then suddenly decides to go off on Crusade, leaving the kingdom in the hands of his seven-year-old illegitimate son, William.  Robert never makes it back, dying on the way in 1035, and back in England, Cnut dies that same year.

Queen Emma wants her son Harthacnut, to be made king.  But there’s another son of Cnut from a previous marriage, Harold Harefoot***, so people pick sides, and the struggles resume.  Harthacnut is already king of Denmark and power struggles there keep him from rushing over to rule England.  After two years, his faction in England starts to lose patience, and everyone is thinking about switching to Harold Harefoot.

It looked as if the queen’s grip on power, assiduously maintained through her marriage to two English kings, was about to end because of her son’s continued absence.  It must have been around this point that she recalled she had two other sons living in exile across the channel…Emma appears to have turned to the sons of her first marriage in a desperate attempt to improve her diminishing political fortunes.

Marc Morris – The Norman Conquest: The Battle of Hastings and the Fall of Anglo-Saxon England

In 1036, her younger son Alfred comes back to England, but Godwine (being Cnut’s man), is pretty sure that this son of Æthelred will throw him out of power, and he engineers an attack on Alfred and his men.  Alfred is blinded and soon dies of his wounds.  (Emma says in her book that someone forged a letter in her name to convince her sons to return.  Historians believe “the woman doth protest too much.”)

Harold Harefoot does become king for a while and Emma is driven into exile.  Then in 1040, Harold dies,  Harthacnut finally gets to be king, and of course Emma is back in power as well.  By all accounts, Harthacnut is a terrible king –  he has Harold Harefoot’s body dug up and thrown into a fen, he raises the taxes 400%, and has his forces burn the city of Worcester when the citizens protest the tax.

And then, he suddenly invites his half-brother Edward, to come back from Normandy and be a co-ruler.  Because monarchs are famous for sharing power like that.  But Edward believes him and comes to England.

(One thing that amazes me in all these machinations, is that even though half the people who are sent or summoned to another kingdom end up imprisoned or killed, people continue to blithely accept invitations.  I would be afraid to set foot outside my hovel.)

According to the Encomium, Harthacnut, Edward, and Emma are “sharers of rule,” comparable even to the Trinity in heaven.  Historians have a hard time believing that this was Harthacnut’s idea, and think that he may have been pressured into it by other strong leaders, maybe even Godwine.

This little experiment doesn’t go on long, because in summer of 1042, Harthacnut drops down while drinking at a wedding, and dies.  Let me quote from my favorite, Marc Norris, again:

A good Viking way to go, to be sure, but also one with more that a hint of suspicion about it, given his massive unpopularity, and the cup that had been in his hand.

It might seem that Harthacnut’s death would make the road ahead all rosy for Edward, but he still has Godwine to contend with.  Before Edward even dreamed of ruling, Godwine was building power and wealth for 25 years.  Edward knows he must have Godwine’s support to stay in power, and even marries his daughter Edith.

Does Edward know that Godwine arranged for Alfred’s death?

In 1051, after six years of marriage to Edith, with no heir on the horizon, (and according to Edith, no consummation of the marriage) Edward announces that he is making William of Normandy his heir.  Other power struggles come to a head at the same time, and Godwine raises up men against Edward, but on the threshold of civil war, it becomes obvious that Godwine will lose.

He asks the king what he will have to do to come to terms of peace, and Edward reportedly says, “Give me back my brother alive.”

Godwine and all his grown sons (including the Harold that will be in the Tapestry) flee and go into exile, and Edward banishes Edith to a nunnery.

So!  We are almost caught up to the time of the Tapestry.  If you want to see it for yourself, this is a panorama. And this is an English replica, that has good short explanations of what is going on each scene.

* Any mention of the Bayeux Tapestry is honor-bound to explain that it is not really a tapestry, in which the picture is created as the fabric is being woven, but an embroidery, in which the picture is sewn on top of an existing piece of cloth.  Since the word “tapestry” isn’t found in the English language until 1467, and the first mention we have of the Bayeux Tapestry is from 1476, I really can’t get too exercised over this.  Terms change.

** A chronicler of the time said that Cnut ordered her to be fetched as his wife, but Emma’s version was that he wooed her back from Normandy with presents.

*** He gets his nickname later, and no one really even knows why, but I’m using it here to distinguish him from the other Harold, Godwine’s son.

 

 

 

 

Textiles at the Briscoe Museum

As many times as I’ve been to San Antonio, you’d think I would have seen every attraction in the city.  But when I was there last week, I noticed the Briscoe Western Art Museum, just across the street from La Villita, the historic art village.  I thought I must have been so busy shopping at Village Weavers over the years, that I had missed a whole art museum!

I went in to check it out on Thursday morning, and was relieved to find out that it just opened in October of 2013, so it wasn’t a case of me being totally oblivious over the years.

It is a lovely museum, very open and light-fiilled.  I enjoyed looking at all the galleries and it looks like they have room to add many more exhibits.  What I liked best was the way they mixed the objects on display – a gallery might have a wagon or a windmill positioned in the middle of photographs, sculptures, and musical instruments, with a documentary video playing as well.  Everyday working objects were placed along side of fancy or historically important ones, and many cultures were represented.

Of course I focused mainly on the textiles.  I didn’t realize it until I looked at my photos, but most of the clothing exhibited was men’s clothing.  You don’t see that so often.

So here are some wonderful examples of men’s clothing from the 1800s.  (Taking photographs through cases never turns out very well, but I am always so happy when a museum allows photography.  You can study the piece at your leisure and you see so much more detail.)

Remember that if you do a mouse-over, the colors will look more intense.

Mexican officer's uniform

Mexican officer’s uniform

jacket detail

Detail of the heavy gold thread.

coat with gold braid

Mexican officer’s coat

war shirt

Blackfoot war shirt (back) from about 1880s – 1890s.

comanchero jacket

Comanchero jacket, circa the 1750s. (Comancheros were Hispanic traders who traded with the Comanche people.) Those flowers were dyed with natural dyes, and they have lasted for 260 years!

And here is something you see even less often – horse trappings.  I haven’t had any horse-related textiles on the blog before!  Another field to research.

embroidered saddle

This incredible piece is labelled “Silk-embroidered Spanish viceroy saddle”, from the 1600s. That is blue velvet in the center section!  I think it needs a whole new term made up to do it justice.

iron fringe

This fringe is made of iron. Can you imagine how it jingles?

flower detail

Such precise stitches!

rabbit detail

The cloth ground looks like a repp weave to me.  Or an unsheared velvet?

embroidery

I love this courtly couple!  With the plumes in her hair, her fan, his walking stick, their fine stockings – they cut a fine figure.

And if you need any further reason to plan a trip to the Briscoe, it’s right on the gorgeous River Walk in San Antonio.  The River Walk (Paseo del Rio) is a pedestrian walkway that meanders along about five miles of the San Antonio River, in the heart of downtown San Antonio, but below street level, so you can mingle with all the other turistas without worrying about getting run over.

River Walk 1

River Walk 2

River Walk 3

I have been traveling so much this summer, I haven’t had much time to do much with textiles – I was happy to get to see some fantastic pieces at the Briscoe!

 

 

 

 

 

 

It’s 10 o’clock – Do You Know Where Your Ranger Is?

Let’s play a guessing game a la “Where in the world is Carmen Sandiego?”

people on plaza

We’re out on a plaza where people gather at all hours – some for the first time, and some for a regular check-in.

T-shirts

Maybe the T-shirts will provide a clue.

niche

A limestone niche…

limestone facade

A familiar silhouette that is not historically correct…

names on monument

Names that are always remembered…

Even on a warm summer night, I feel a little shiver here.

Where do you think we are?

 

This is this week’s entry for the 1 Day 1 World Project, for the 10:00 – 11:00 pm hour.

Nature at Night

ledge

This is the ledge of the Devil’s Sinkhole, just before 9 pm.

Millions of Mexican free-tailed bats have a summer home in Texas.  They live in large colonies scattered across the state.   We went to watch them emerge at sunset from the Devil’s Sinkhole near Rocksprings.  The bats there are roosting in a huge underground cavern that is 350 feet deep.  They can’t fly straight up, so they fly in a spiral to exit the cave, flying just inches from you as you stand right on the ledge.  It takes about 20 minutes for them to exit the cave and fly out of sight, looking like a smoky tornado as they head south to feed on moths.

(My pictures are not great – my camera cannot handle “night scenery” and “fast motion” at the same time. I encourage you to look at the official Devil’s Sinkhole site link above to see better pictures and even videos.)

bats

The bats emerging.

 

sinkhole

I Photoshopped this one so you could see the sinkhole better.

I love to see them, not only because I love nature in general, but because they represent a victory for environmentalists.  Bat watching is a popular summer activity now, but it wasn’t always that way.   As recently as the 1980s, the Austin American-Statesman newspaper ran headlines guaranteed to terrify its readers about the bats that were roosting under the Congress Avenue Bridge.  One man, Merlin Tuttle, moved to Austin with the goal of educating the public about the benefits of bats, and managed to change public opinion so much, that there is now a monument to the bat and a special viewing area in Austin.  Bat tourism brings in ten million dollars a year to the Austin economy!  Watching the bats emerge reminds me of this success and gives me hope for wildlife conservation.

This is my entry for the 1 Day 1 World Project for the 9:00 – 10:00 pm hour.  Check out the other entries for a virtual journey.

 

 

 

Textile Traditions on Independence Day

This past weekend, we went out to our favorite Hill Country town, Rocksprings, for the re-dedication ceremony for the newly restored 1891 county courthouse.  Edwards County has a strong history of sheep and angora goat ranching, and traces of it were evident in the celebration.

I would love to put captions on these pictures, but apparently WordPress has changed formats again, and I cannot figure it out.  I cannot even find a help button.  I can’t see a “preview” button either, so I can’t see if the post looks okay. 

So!  I will just have to give you information totally removed from its picture, and hope you can figure it out.

If you look at the arched doorway of the courthouse, you might notice two big lumps, one on each side.  These were bags of mohair and wool!  It is not every keynote speaker who shares the stage with bags of fibers.

When it came time for the ribbon cutting, some of the officials used “tijeras” or the old hand-held shears.  If you look at the picture of just two of the men, you can also see the baling hook on top of the wool bag.

In the audience I saw a woman in a beautiful crocheted dress.  It turned out that she was this year’s Old Settlers Queen, and the dress was made in 1934 (I’m pretty sure) for one of her ancestors, a great-aunt or great-grandmother.  I was hoping to get to talk to her about it, but she was busy being on her parade float so I didn’t get a chance.  The dress looked to be made of cotton, and it had lovely drape.  It looked so fresh and stylish; it was the perfect summer dress.

The rest of the day was fun too, as small town celebrations usually are.  And it will all be covered in the best small town newspaper ever – the Texas Mohair Weekly!

 

Waltz Across Texas

We love to go to the Sunday evening concerts at a local winery.  Out in the middle of a big field, a couple of hundred people bring in chairs, blankets, and picnics for an evening listening to a local band.  Everyone is laid back – babies are cooed over, kids strike up instant friendships and play kickball or turn cartwheels on the perimeter.

We enjoy our pinot grigio and prosciutto, sit back and listen, and toast the sunset.  And when it’s time to go, we don’t have to worry about lost cars or traffic jams!

(If you mouse over the pictures, the color and contrast get better.)

people at concert

This is not the best picture, but you can see how open and green the surroundings are.

band

The Lost & Nameless Orchestra

 

twin fiddles

“If you’re gonna play in Texas, you gotta have fiddles in the band….”

This is the Lost and Nameless Orchestra from Austin, on June 22.   All the band members played several instruments – I think the lead singer played four or five.  And she writes her own songs.  And she just graduated from high school!

dancers

Waltzing on a Texas summer night. Or possibly two-stepping.

I was trying out my camera’s “night portrait” setting.  I also left the shutter open and swung the camera around to see what light effects I could get.

light effects

I did this on purpose! It wasn’t because I had just split a bottle of wine with my sister.

 

This is my 8:00 – 9:00 pm entry for the 1 Day 1 World Project. Lisa at Northwest Frame of Mind (the home of the 1 Day 1 World Project) is also showcasing concert photos for her entry this week – it’s fun to see the different takes on this typical summer event!