Domestics and the Crinoline in 1862
Yesterday we went to an estate sale at a huge ranch. Thousands of items were being sold, but most of them were just ordinary things like throw pillows or boxes of glassware from Walmart, priced as if they were brand new retail items. We weren’t interested in buying plastic candy bowls or lawn chairs, but we had fun wandering around. In one of the barns I found some old books in very bad condition, but a quick flip-through showed me some illustrations of women in hoop skirts, so I paid my five dollars and took them home.
When I got a good look at them, I realized they were bound issues of the London magazine Punch, from 1861, 1862, and 1865! Punch was a weekly magazine that poked fun of politicians, the Church, other countries, and what we would call pop culture. There is so much of interest in these issues that I am going to share small bits in a series.
First, a quick look at some portrayals of domestic servants. Fashion plates for this era are easy to find, but I especially love illustrations of ordinary people and what they wore. All of these are from the 1862 volume.

The domestic looks much improved in this cartoon, which was on the same page — Missus. “Mary! Go and take off that thing, directly! Pray, are you aware what a ridiculous object you are?”
I love the look on her husband’s face. He is enjoying the situation but he is too wise to say a word about it. Also, nice checked pants.

A message comes off on Mrs. Bluebag’s linen, which she is hanging, as usual, on the telegraph wires.
I love her bonnet and the way her apron is strapped around her.
The publishers of Punch found the fashion for crinolines ridiculous, and returned to it in just about every issue. Here is a typical small article:

Announcing to the Ladies of Britain that crinolines will be banned from the upcoming International Exhibition.
To the Ladies of Britain
(Important)
The British Manufacturers complain that they are allowed very insufficient space at the International Exhibition, and that they shall be able to do no justice to themselves. The directors do not know what to do, and heartily wish that they had constructed the building of India-rubber, so that it might have been stretched out to Hammersmith, if necessary. One idea has occurred to them in their despair. Sheffield, where steel is chiefly manufactured, is earnest in its complaints of want of room. The directors appeal to the ladies of England on behalf of the town that “Forges those bars of steel that arm Aurelia with the shape to kill.”
In a word, it is in contemplation to announce, that room must be made for the exhibition by the exclusion of Crinoline. The official notification is not yet out, but Mr. Punch, who is in the secret, at once gives his lovely friends the hint. Surely, between this and May, their exquisite taste will enable them to devise a dress that shall not, like Mars, cover nine acres of ground. Why should Venus — but we have mislaid our Lemprière, and may mull the classical compliment. We trust, however, that the ladies will do us the justice to admit that we told them what was coming, and if they don’t believe us, let them wait until they see the turn-stiles now in course of erection. They are those from the Parisian Bourse, which the Emperor has ordered to be taken away, and which M. Fould has disposed of to the Commissioners here.
If you are interested and want to read this for yourself, this volume is free as an e-book on Google books.
As I looked at the book more carefully, I noticed that the cover was coming apart and the layers of paper and cloth constructing it were showing.
It looked like the paper layers were some old club or restaurant invoices. And of course I had to get a good look at the cloth. You can see the selvage here!
It seems to be cotton, with about 40 warp ends per inch (16 per cm). Of course by 1862, with the American Civil War going on, cotton had become hard to get and the Lancashire Cotton Famine was causing great hardship for textile workers, as I have written about here. The 1865 Punch volume cover is made only of cardboard and paper, with no cloth lining. I wonder if the difference in covers had anything to do with the difficulty of getting cotton, or if it was just a coincidence.
Next up: some commentary on men’s fashions.
What a treat to have fallen upon these treasures! If you’d gone searching for them, might never have found them!
Yes, I didn’t see anything of interest in the library of that home, but these boxes in the barn called out to me.
Fascinating. I love the picture of the apron tied around the crinoline.
I know! Now I want to know, did she step into the apron with the strings already tied in place? Did someone have to reach down there and tie them for her? She doesn’t look like she could reach back there herself!
What a fabulous find! Clothing history and humor rolled into one. I’d love to see some of those cartoons printed on fabric to use for home decor. Yes, women’s fashions are often ridiculous, witness those 5 inch heels that will make the fortune of orthopedic knee surgeons 20 years hence.
And I love the style of the quickly sketched lines. These cartoons are about 4 inches high, 6 inches wide – when I photograph them, the pictures end up 28 inches wide or something like that, and yet when I zoom in, the lines are sharp. They would still look good if you printed them up in a larger size.
What fun! I can imagine you poring over every page, as I would, too. Thanks for the link to the Lancashire cotton famine. I’ll go there next for a read.
Yes, I read a little bit and then go online to find out what in the world they were talking about in some of these articles!
I dressed in a Civil War re-enactor’s crinoline once, to help a student out, and can I just say how glad I am to live now instead of in that era! Your estate sale find is the coolest–and it goes to show that, with enough poking around, there are very few of these sales that are completely without redeeming value!
Yes, I can tell that this find is going to take me down some interesting paths. 🙂
PUNCH!! What a treat! Had not even thought about them since leaving England..1968.
Also hadn’t thought about the cotton impact on England, thinking it the other way around .but maybe i am thinking of your last post re all the fabrics shipped to the US during the Revolutionary time……getting my history mixed up! Thanks for setting me straight.
Good point! In every colony England had, they ruled that the colony sent all raw materials to England, and they were the only ones allowed to process it, and then the colonials were supposed to pay full price for the manufacturing and shipping, etc. Nobody was supposed to cut costs by processing it in their home country. By the time of our Civil War, we did have factories here, but a lot of the raw materials still went to England. The South thought England would come in on their side due to the fact that their industry was so dependent on Southern cotton. But of course England didn’t, and their whole textile industry had a terrible time. Machinery that was geared for cotton couldn’t just switch over to wool or linen, and I’m not sure how much of those raw materials were available anyway.
England was still doing this to India into the 1900s, and that’s why Gandhi made a big deal of spinning cotton himself and wearing homespun clothes. And I’m currently reading a book about how we’re all still caught up in an unfair textile system today. Sigh. I wish my favorite pastime didn’t have such a terrible side, or that I could do more to make it all fair.
Thank you. I am also reminded of all the cotton rags that went into the paper industry and the difficulty of finding these cloths for the bridal coverlets. Need to re read ‘Keep Me Warm One Night’, Hand weaving in Eastern Canada… 1700 and 1800’s. That is a wonderful book. Most expensive second hand book I ever bought and I love it!
I need to read that too. I can see the cover in my head but I don’t think I ever read it. I have so many books I want to read!
yup, so many books so little time! Also applies to Many things…must get on to them NOW.
Now I’m understanding “punch” a bit more after reading this post, as i had starred wit la test post. Ugh… What a find you got for a merely $5.! I agree with you on paying market value for plastic, etc. Went into an antique store earlier this week, and they had some quilts stacked up. Most were whole cloth and prices were ridiculously high. It’s always fun to look as one never knows….
Pingback: Punch Looks at Photographers – Deep in the Heart of Textiles